Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu recently criticized his predecessor and current YSRCP leader, Jagan Mohan Reddy, regarding the ongoing debate surrounding the preparation of prasadam laddoos at the Tirupati temple. Naidu accused Reddy of trying to justify alleged wrongdoing concerning the procurement of ghee for these sacred offerings. In response to the situation, Naidu has established a high-level committee to investigate the matter thoroughly.
During a press conference in Vijayawada, Naidu expressed serious concerns about procedural changes in the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD) under Reddy’s governance. He alleged that standards for sourcing ghee had been lowered, compromising quality. Naidu claimed that previously, suppliers needed at least three years of experience to qualify, but this requirement was reduced to just one year under Reddy. He also pointed out that the financial turnover required for suppliers had dropped significantly, from ₹250 crore to ₹150 crore, raising questions about the purity of the ghee provided.
Naidu emphasized that the current price of ghee, listed at ₹319 per unit, seemed implausible given that even palm oil costs more. He voiced skepticism about the claims made by Reddy regarding the thoroughness of ghee testing, stating that the TTD lacks the necessary labs to conduct comprehensive adulteration tests. He stressed that only NABL-accredited labs are capable of performing such analyses, and without adequate infrastructure, Reddy’s assertions about the testing procedures were questionable.
In response to Reddy’s accusations that Naidu was exploiting religious sentiments for political gain, Naidu dismissed the claims as absurd. He noted that they were still within the initial 100 days of his administration, challenging Reddy to focus on policy discussions instead of trying to distract from pressing governance issues. Naidu announced plans for a thorough investigation led by the Inspector General of Police, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the sanctity of religious practices and institutions.
In a notable turn of events, Reddy responded by writing a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging intervention in the matter. He labeled Naidu a “habitual liar” and accused him of manipulating religious sentiments for political advantage. Reddy argued that a robust procurement process had been in place for years, suggesting that the same standards were upheld during Naidu’s previous term from 2014 to 2019. He questioned why Naidu was only raising these issues now, especially since the alleged adulteration had been reported two months earlier.
Reddy implored the Prime Minister to reprimand Naidu for spreading what he termed “falsehoods” that could undermine the trust of millions of devotees in the TTD. He asserted that Naidu’s actions not only diminished the dignity of his office but also threatened the integrity of religious practices overseen by the TTD.
Adding to the controversy, Shamala Rao, the executive officer of the TTD, clarified that the board had recently established a testing system for ghee adulteration, marking the first time such measures were taken. She acknowledged that TTD had historically not conducted in-house testing, but the new system aimed to enhance quality control. If any supplier attempted to deliver adulterated products, the TTD would take strict legal action, including blacklisting offenders.
Jagan Shamelessly Trying To Justify His Crime': CM Naidu Orders High
The situation escalated further when senior YSRCP leader Y.V. Subba Reddy filed a petition in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, seeking clarification on the allegations concerning the use of animal fat in the laddoos. He aimed to initiate proceedings to reveal the truth about the claims made by Naidu, especially regarding the quality of ingredients used during the previous YSRCP administration. The High Court is set to hear this petition on September 25.
Moreover, a separate petition was filed in the Supreme Court, contending that the purported use of inappropriate ingredients in the laddoos violated fundamental Hindu customs and offended the sentiments of countless devotees. This legal action underscores the intense public interest and emotional investment in the sanctity of the Tirupati prasadam.
The controversy initially sparked when Naidu alleged that the previous YSRCP government had compromised the quality of prasadam by using substandard ingredients, including animal fats, in the preparation of laddoos. Such claims have profound implications, as they challenge the integrity of one of the most revered religious practices in India.
Tirupati Laddu row: Jagan writes to PM Modi, says Naidu's claims
Both leaders are engaging in a war of words that reflects broader political tensions in the state. Naidu’s assertions and Reddy’s rebuttals highlight the competitive nature of Andhra Pradesh’s political landscape, particularly in relation to issues of faith and public trust. The stakes are high, as both leaders seek to secure the loyalty of a religiously devout electorate.
As the investigation proceeds, and with legal actions unfolding, the situation remains dynamic. Public sentiment is heavily intertwined with these developments, making it crucial for both sides to navigate this issue carefully. The outcome will likely influence not only the political fortunes of both Naidu and Reddy but also the broader discourse on the intersection of governance, faith, and public trust in Andhra Pradesh.
In conclusion, the ongoing controversy surrounding the Tirupati prasadam laddoos has opened a significant dialogue about the intersection of religion and politics in Andhra Pradesh. With legal actions pending and both parties unwilling to back down, the implications of this debate will resonate beyond the immediate political landscape, impacting the beliefs and sentiments of millions of devotees. As the situation evolves, all eyes will be on the judicial outcomes and the reactions from both political factions as they strive to uphold their positions amid rising tensions.